tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390403314045876459.post1976454915228052031..comments2023-11-22T12:30:25.017-08:00Comments on Paroikos Bible Blog: Resources for Studying and Preaching 1 PeterPaul A Himeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07238272703123690959noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390403314045876459.post-35395572880748752542011-06-18T07:42:29.871-07:002011-06-18T07:42:29.871-07:00Thanks for the post! Surprisingly, I think Wayne G...Thanks for the post! Surprisingly, I think Wayne Grudem was actually more of an NT student before going into Systematics. Wish he had stayed NT, but that's just my bias coming through.<br /> Your comments on the Baker series are well-taken. They can be a little bit light on the language side side, disappointing since I think it's otherwise a solid exegetical series. For heavy-lifting, Elliott is definitely preferable, though Jobes is easier to read (I've also read her work with Silva on the LXX, which was very accessible and enjoyable)Paul A Himeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07238272703123690959noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3390403314045876459.post-40398536448182229322011-06-15T08:13:32.506-07:002011-06-15T08:13:32.506-07:00Advocating both Grudem and Jobes certainly will ma...Advocating both Grudem and Jobes certainly will make some people smile. I haven't read Grudem's book, I was under the impression he was a systematic theology scholar. Jobes I have read, her book she co-authored with Silva on the LXX. I think once I had her 1Peter via ILL, but it didn't make much of an impression. That series is easy to read but doesn't spend much time talking about original languages or discourse analysis. The flagship volume by D. Boch on Luke was what R. T. France has referred to as a commentary on the commentaries, a lot of space used talking about Jesus Seminar which is now ancient history.C. Stirling Bartholomewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03571440237755902925noreply@blogger.com